[DeathMarine]

can anyone send one my way? I've been itching to try it out.

the email:
deathmarine@gmail.com

[product]

The site says that that it is currently in "Limited Field Trial" you can enter your email here so they can notify you if the site is officially open or to get an invite to the "Field Trial". https://services.google.com/fb/forms/googleplus/

[false member]

Seems like you are in already.

[DeathMarine]

yeah, i got an invite from a long time friend.

[07cbdj]

So, is it any good? What is Google Plus to begin with? Another social network?

[DeathMarine]

its better than facebook. you have circles and you put people in the circles. you can make posts that only go to certain circles. like i can post stuff about hentai and only have certain people see the post. you have alot more control over your info unlike facebook.

I always avoided using facebook because i dont want certain people knowing what i do like family and certain friends and possible co-workders. i can be dirty and an ass with a circle and be prim and proper with another.

you should check it out if you are into that stuff.

[07cbdj]

I see. I may give it a try. It's still being tested, right?

[07cbdj]

So, is there anybody else from HShare on Google Plus?

[DeathMarine]

some, i have about 50 people on my hshare circle

[07cbdj]

Would be nice to add each other.

Here I am: http://anonym.to/?https://plus.google.com/118179997708609007207/about

[CodeH]

im there, and i already added sir DM ^^

[krakr]

I had to opt out of it. When you're logged in, google records everything you do.
Facebook is way too public for me, but that's just waaaaay too creepy & dangerous for me.
Quote from ZDnet (a division of Cnet & now the whole CBS family)
Point is, ZDnet & Cnet are trusted sources for technical jazz. Unless it relates to CBS now lol
I remember before they merged. One of em publishes PCMag anywho.

Redirect link to actual article http://anonym.to/?http://www.zdnet.com/blog/projectfailures/google-plus-is-privacy-an-issue/13749 I recommend reading the entire article.

If you thought the Dropbox terms of service were problematic (here and here), then look at Google’s (emphasis added):

You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.

On the surface, it seems rather innocuous, intended merely to give Google permission to transmit your data across various networks onto all sorts of mobile devices. However, Google demands extremely broad rights from users. Under what circumstances would you sign a contract giving someone such free range with your intellectual property?

[false member]

Those terms highlighted there are quite common to almost any online service where users can publish content on.

[07cbdj]

I don't think I have any intellectual property to be stolen.

[ray2009lancer@gmail.com]

hi guys